Call for Papers by Centre for Tax Laws, NLU Delhi: Themes, Research Scope, and Practical Takeaways

Introduction: The Significance of Tax Jurisprudence in Contemporary India

The National Law University, Delhi (NLU Delhi), through its Centre for Tax Laws (CTL), frequently issues a Call for Papers (CFP) to invite critical scholarly contributions on direct and indirect taxation. In a legal landscape defined by rapid regulatory reforms, cross-border digital transactions, and aggressive revenue enforcement, academic discourse plays an indispensable role in shaping future policy and jurisprudence.

For legal academicians, practitioners, and postgraduate researchers across India—including the financial commercial hub of Mumbai and the wider Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR)—contributing to or studying the output of such platforms provides a vital bridge between high-level legislative intent and courtroom reality. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the CTL NLU Delhi Call for Papers, key research themes, guidance on framing impactful legal submissions, and the real-world implications of tax research for businesses and practitioners.

---

Understanding the Centre for Tax Laws (CTL), NLU Delhi

The Centre for Tax Laws at NLU Delhi was established to foster advanced legal research, policy critique, and academic dialogue on Indian and international taxation laws. Through seminars, policy recommendations submitted to the Ministry of Finance, and regular scholarly publications (including journals and working paper series), CTL provides an institutional forum for rigorous critique.

Calls for Papers issued by CTL typically invite submissions in the form of:

• Long Articles / Research Papers: 6,000 to 10,000 words focusing on comprehensive doctrinal, empirical, or comparative tax analysis.
• Short Essays / Notes: 3,000 to 5,000 words analyzing emerging statutory developments or conflicting judicial interpretations.
• Case Comments: 1,500 to 3,000 words dissecting recent judgments of the Supreme Court of India, High Courts, or the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).

---

Key Thematic Areas Ripe for Scholarly Exploration

When responding to a Call for Papers by an institution of NLU Delhi's stature, authors must address contemporary bottlenecks and uncodified ambiguities within the Indian tax ecosystem. Below are the dominant subject areas that define modern Indian taxation discourse.

1. International Taxation and the Two-Pillar Solution

The ongoing implementation of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) has fundamentally disrupted traditional notions of permanent establishment (PE) and source-based taxation.

• Pillar One: Fair allocation of taxing rights over multinational enterprises (MNEs) to market jurisdictions, directly impacting digital conglomerates operating in India.
• Pillar Two (Global Anti-Base Erosion - GloBE Rules): The establishment of a 15% global minimum effective tax rate. Submissions can analyze the readiness of the Indian domestic tax regime to integrate Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-Up Taxes (QDMTT) and the future viability of unilateral digital taxes such as the Equalisation Levy.

2. The Goods and Services Tax (GST) Regime: Structural and Procedural Challenges

Seven years into India's landmark indirect tax reform, several constitutional and administrative friction points remain unresolved:

• Establishment of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT): Following statutory amendments under the Finance Acts of 2023 and 2024, the operationalization of GSTAT benches (including in key commercial states like Maharashtra) is critical to alleviate the tremendous burden currently placed on High Courts via writ petitions under Article 226.
• Input Tax Credit (ITC) Litigation: The interplay between Section 16(2)(c), Section 16(4), and fundamental constitutional rights regarding supplier default versus bona fide purchaser liability.
• Enforcement Mechanisms: The constitutional validity and procedural safeguards regarding summons, provisional attachment of bank accounts under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, and the balance between revenue security and business continuity.

3. Direct Tax Reassessment and Faceless Procedures

The Finance Act, 2021 substituted the decades-old reassessment framework under Sections 147 to 151 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 with a new regime under Section 148 and Section 148A. This reform led to massive litigation before various High Courts and the Supreme Court (e.g., the Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal line of jurisprudence).

• Scholarly analysis can examine whether the procedural hurdles under Section 148A have genuinely minimized harassment or merely opened new procedural grounds for quashing assessment orders.
• The efficacy and constitutional resilience of the Faceless Assessment and Appeal Schemes, with specific focus on principles of natural justice and the right to an effective oral hearing.

4. Taxation of the Digital Economy and Virtual Digital Assets

• Section 115BBH and Section 194S of the Income Tax Act introduced strict flat-rate taxation and Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on the transfer of Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs).
• Submissions can examine the economic impact of these provisions, the cross-border tracking of decentralized finance (DeFi) transactions, and the classification of NFTs and utility tokens.

---

Framework for Drafting a High-Impact Submission

To ensure a paper meets the rigorous editorial standards of the Centre for Tax Laws at NLU Delhi, contributors should adhere to the following best practices:

1. Formulate a Clear Normative Hypothesis: Descriptive papers summarizing statutory sections rarely clear peer review. Submissions must present a clear problem statement—such as a statutory contradiction, an unresolved judicial conflict, or an economic distortion—and defend a concrete thesis.
2. Engage with Primary Sources: Ground arguments directly in statutory provisions, parliamentary standing committee reports, Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) / Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) circulars, and primary case law.
3. Maintain Contextual Commercial Awareness: Pure legal theory often falls flat in tax law. Acknowledge how tax interpretations impact business risk, compliance costs, and foreign direct investment.
4. Strict Adherence to Citation Standards: Ensure uniform citation following the Bluebook (usually 20th or 21st edition) or the specific citation guide prescribed in the CTL call document.

---

Practical Implications for Mumbai and MMR Businesses

While academic journals may appear detached from day-to-day operations, the scholarship emerging from centers like CTL NLU Delhi directly informs public policy, parliamentary debates, and strategic judicial interpretation.

For corporate houses, startups, and mid-market enterprises across Mumbai, Thane, and Mira Road, monitoring these scholarly trends offers valuable foresight:

• Anticipating Legislative Shifts: Academic critiques often form the basis of subsequent amendments in the annual Union Budget.
• Strengthening Litigation Strategy: Arguments formulated in peer-reviewed tax journals are frequently relied upon by senior advocates before the ITAT, High Courts, and the Supreme Court to interpret ambiguous statutory provisions.

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. Who is eligible to submit papers to the CTL NLU Delhi Call for Papers?

Typically, submissions are open to legal practitioners, judicial officers, chartered accountants, academicians, tax researchers, and law students (both LL.B. and LL.M. candidates). Specific eligibility criteria and co-authorship policies are defined in the specific call announcement issued by the Centre.

2. Can co-authorship be interdisciplinary (e.g., a Lawyer and a Chartered Accountant)?

Yes, most academic calls issued by tax centers welcome interdisciplinary collaboration between legal professionals and finance/accounting professionals, as taxation sits at the intersection of law, accounting principles, and economics.

3. What citation style is generally expected for tax law submissions?

NLU Delhi publications typically require the Harvard Bluebook citation style (20th or 21st edition) with detailed footnotes. Authors should avoid endnotes or informal hyperlinking unless expressly permitted in blog/short-essay formats.

4. Does publication in such journals assist in tax litigation?

While academic articles are not binding on judicial authorities, high-quality, peer-reviewed analysis is often cited as persuasive commentary before High Courts and the Supreme Court when interpreting newly drafted sections or conflicting precedents.

---

Connect with APS Law

Navigating corporate tax compliance, direct tax reassessments, and GST disputes requires an understanding of statutory nuances and evolving administrative trends. APS Law assists corporate entities, mid-market businesses, and individual taxpayers across Mumbai, Thane, and Mira Road in handling tax litigation, indirect tax advisory, and compliance strategies.

To schedule a consultation or discuss your direct and indirect tax matters, please contact APS Law.