+91-9820096678
·
[email protected]
Mon - Sat 09:00-22:00
·
Mumbai
Chennai
Trusted By
10,000+ Clients
Free consultant

Category

Legal
In a landmark judgment reaffirming that statutory adoption rights transcend religious boundaries, the Madras High Court in K. Heerajohn v. District Registrar, Madurai District & Anr. [W.P. (MD) No. 27615 of 2025, decided on 17 October 2025] held that adoption under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (JJ Act) is uniform and...
Read More
Allahabad High Court in Neha & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Ors., Habeas Corpus Writ Petition No. 875 of 2025, delivered a landmark judgment reaffirming the inviolability of the age of consent fixed at 18 years under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS). The Court categorically ruled that a minor girl’s cohabitation with an...
Read More
The All India Bar Examination (AIBE) is a crucial step for law graduates aspiring to practice law in India. Due to the increasing competition, securing a passing score in the AIBE has become more challenging over the years. Practicing past papers and the AIBE’s model question papers is a proven method to boost preparation and...
Read More
When a marriage breaks down, one of the most pressing questions concerns the woman’s right to reside in her matrimonial home—especially when the property legally belongs to her in-laws. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act) was enacted to shield women from domestic abuse and ensure secure residence, but its practical...
Read More
In a significant reaffirmation of constitutional values and personal liberty, the Allahabad High Court in Tehseem & Another v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Others (Habeas Corpus Writ Petition No. 957 of 2025, decided on October 18, 2025) delivered a powerful verdict upholding the right of an interfaith couple to live together free from State...
Read More
In a landmark judgment delivered on October 15, 2025, the Supreme Court of India reaffirmed the principle that genuine cultivators should not be made to suffer under the guise of forest conservation. In M. Jameela v. State of Kerala & Anr., the Court declared that a 37.5-acre coffee and cardamom plantation in Wayanad was not...
Read More
In matrimonial disputes, one of the recurring procedural complications arises when both spouses file petitions for divorce or judicial separation in different courts. The question then becomes: which court should proceed, and how should the cases be handled to prevent conflicting decisions? Bombay High Court, in Suprabha Nitesh Patil @ Suprabha Anant Khot v. Nitesh...
Read More
In a landmark judgment reinforcing India’s constitutional commitment to environmental protection, the Supreme Court of India, in M.C. Mehta v. Union of India & Ors. (W.P. (C) No. 13029 of 1985), ruled that public health and environmental concerns must prevail over commercial gains and traditional festivities. The Court, led by Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and...
Read More
Shryeshth Ramesh Sharma is a seasoned legal professional with over 20 years of experience in dispute resolution, regulatory litigation, and criminal law. He began his career in the office of Mr Arun Bhardwaj, Senior Advocate, where he gained a strong foundation in litigation, and later served as Senior Legal Officer at Nestlé India Ltd. before...
Read More
The Supreme Court’s judgment examines the scope and extent of the Armed Forces Tribunal’s (AFT) power under Section 15(6) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, to substitute one finding of guilt with another under the Army Act, 1950. The decision reiterates that while the Tribunal may substitute a conviction if the evidence justifies a...
Read More
1 2 3 133